For operators
In-service verification for humanoid robots
01/08
Scope of inquiry
Two questions are certain
Your first humanoids are coming.
Your works council will ask for proof they are safe next to your people.
Your insurer will ask what exactly it is covering.
02/08
Evidence on hand
Today's only answer
The maker's word about its own robots.
Its demo, its dashboard, its telemetry: real information, produced by the party that sold you the machine, graded against criteria it set itself.
03/08
Chain of custody
The day something goes wrong
The liability is yours. The explanation lives in the maker's logs. An arm was fully yours: its program, its data, its witness parts. A humanoid runs the maker's model and reports to the maker's cloud.
You own the machine and the risk. The maker owns the story.
And clearing yourself is easy when you hold the only record.
04/08
Detection limit
What you will not see coming
On your arms, wear shows in the parts, and your quality control catches it weeks before anything breaks.
On a humanoid, the AI corrects every mechanical error in real time, until the margin runs out.
The first visible sign, for you, is the incident itself: a dropped part, a stopped line, an injury.
05/08
Statutory basis
The duty is already on your side of the table
European workplace law already makes the employer inspect work equipment exposed to conditions that cause deterioration: periodically, by competent persons, results recorded and kept available for the authorities (Directive 2009/104/EC, art. 5, transposed in every market we serve).
For a humanoid, three pieces are missing. No text sets a frequency. No list names robots for mandatory third-party inspection. And "competent person" can be your own employee, which fails you twice. In front of your works council, your insurer or a court, an employee's signature is a self-check. And no employee, however competent, can see 0.1 mm of joint drift or a force sensor reading 8% high on a walk-around: that takes a calibrated instrument.
The duty exists. The method does not. We sell the method, and a third party who signs it.
06/08
Apparatus
The station on your site
A fixed test stand on your site. Each robot steps on and runs a 10 to 15 minute scripted pass: reach a reference handle, press a calibrated force point, read test targets, part of it with the AI correction off so the wear shows. No human in the loop.
Every pass goes into that robot's life record. The record is yours: you decide who reads what. Your insurer, to price the premium on measured condition instead of a flat rate. A buyer, at resale. An inspector, if one ever asks.
10–15min
Scripted pass, per robot, no human in the loop
07/08
Measured outcomes
What changes for you
You know the real state and value of your fleet, unit by unit.
Worn units get flagged before the incident, not after.
When something does go wrong, you hold an independent record that defends you, instead of depending on the maker's logs.
And every certificate carries the signature of an accountable third party, not of your own payroll.
08/08
Acceptance criteria
Start before the first robot
Our first product is an acceptance protocol: pass or fail criteria agreed before your pilot starts, measured independently, so the pilot ends with a decision instead of an opinion.
If humanoids are on your roadmap, talk to us before the purchase order.